The phenomenon of the government arming itself with more and more powers to control the people is not of recent origin but began long back, in the second year itself after India's Constitution was adopted on 26th January 1950. The following excerpts from a recent report on The New Indian Express shows what actually caused the first amendment bill and the profound words of Syama Prasad Mookerjee who opposed the Bill. Shri Mookerjee founded Jana Sangh the predecessor of BJP who died later on 23rd June 1953 in Kashmir during imprisonment for defying the order banning entry into the State without 'permission'. The govt. claimed that he died due to heart attack but there were widespread suspicion about the actual cause of his death. The Mother, may years later, said he was assassinated (vide Agenda of the Supramental Action on Earth).
![]() |
| The Constitution of India - Preamble & Fundamental Rights |
The Prime Minister of India Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, while moving the First Amendment Bill, stated that Fundamental Rights were relics of a static age trying to preserve the status quo and social inequalities; whereas Directive Principles were dynamic ideas of social reform and social engineering. The Amendment was conceived to circumvent some verdicts of the judiciary which was vigorously upholding civil liberties. Nehru asserted that "Parliament, representing the will of people, decides on certain social reforms. These are then, by process of interpretation of the Constitution, held up by the judiciary...If the Constitution itself comes in our way, then surely it is time to change the Constitution to that extent."
On 12 May 1951, Nehru introduced the Constitution (First Amendment) Bill in Parliament without any prior notice, and on 16 May, the Bill was referred to a Select Committee. There began the first battle of Indian liberalism and Mookejee emerged as a chivalrous defender of Fundamental Rights. He was undeniably a giant in the Indian political landscape. He assailed the First Amendment Bill by calling it ‘the beginning of the encroachment of the liberty of the people of Free India’.
“What he [Nehru] is going to do is nothing short of cutting at the very root of the fundamental principles of the Constitution which he helped, more than anybody else, to pass only about a year and a half ago. This is the challenge he has deliberately thrown at the people of India...is it due to fear? Does he feel that he is incapable today of carrying on the administration of the country unless he is clothed with more and more powers to be arbitrarily utilized so that his will may be the last word on the subject? Or is it his doubt in the wisdom of the people whose champion he has been all his life? Does he feel that people of India have run amuck and cannot be trusted with the freedom that has been given to them?” Mookerjee thundered in Parliament. He criticized further restrictions on free speech and called it a ploy to penalize the government’s political opponents. He argued that democratic freedom necessarily implied that any viewpoint be allowed to circulate in the country so long as it did not advocate violence and chaos.
(Excerpts from "Syama Prasad Mookerjee and the first battle of Indian liberalism, Faisal C.K, The New Indian Express", 6th July 2024)
![]() |
| Syama Prasad Mookerjee (1901 - 1953) |



