The dangers of allowing foreign ownership of India’s critical infrastructure and foreign control over information flow on that infrastructure cannot be overstated. Especially when the foreign hand has a history of facilitating civil wars and regime changes. And specifically, when it explicitly states its intention of influencing every level of operation of the country, of advocating for the underclasses, and demanding accountability from the government. And when, by virtue of its control over the critical infrastructure, it can anticipate the government’s response. The process of driving a wedge between the government and the people of the country has already started. The foundation has been laid and the structure is being rapidly built up. The risk to India’s sovereignty and democracy seems unprecedented.
*
The core thesis of Wokeism is that all structures must be dismantled that are in any way linked to the oppression of any groups of people and that were erected by the oppressors. We support this in principle as a way to remedy the past and move forward to a better future for humanity. But we point out that: Entirely new structures of oppression are being erected using technologies like Artificial Intelligence and big data in which the oppressors are the new elites. Entirely new kind of oppressor/ oppressed categories will replace the identities of race, ethnicity, religion, gender and sexual orientation. Dismantling the old structures is helping pave the way for the new technology-driven structures of oppression to fill the vacuum of power. We are referring to a digital caste system. Such a scenario ought to lead all well-wishers of humanity to investigate: What is the relationship between these two mega trends: Wokeism as a dismantling force, and the rise of the new techno-elites?
*
One clue is the strange irony in the partnership between the Global Left’s Wokeism and the global billionaires: The billionaires have outsourced the dismantling of the old order to the Left using them as useful idiots. This alliance will be a temporary one in which one side is using the other to do the dirty work. Once the job of dismantling is done, the Woke Left will be rendered useless, and a new hierarchy will emerge, with the billionaires at the helm.
*
The diagram on the following page gives the big picture with India as the case study. It depicts the ultra-rich as the barbarians at the gate, using Wokeism as a useful tool for dismantling India. We will explain the scenario in which the global elites will run the new power structures with the Indian billionaires as junior partners much like the zamindars served the East India Company. The global elites have articulated their strategies openly and with clarity, and the events thus far indicate they have built up considerable momentum. One of the big developments under way towards the new world order is the removal of the separation of business and government, leading to a concentration of power that is essentially a global oligarchy. This new paradigm has been termed stakeholder capitalism by its lead proponent, the World Economic Forum. Its main tenet is that corporates should take over many of the roles that governments play. This is being done in the guise of social justice and impact investing. Stakeholder capitalism will transform capitalists into oligarchs by merging business and politics.
*
 |
| A screen displays at the venue of WEF, Davos, Switzerland |
The limited liability company, that was meant to pursue shareholder profit, is being repurposed as a vehicle for social interventions. The question arises, why do they not use the structure of independent non- profit philanthropies that are meant for charity? The answer is that public charities are open to public scrutiny under the laws. The limited liability private companies are not subject to the same accountability for their social impact the way public charities are. For instance, India’s FCRA laws monitor foreign funds coming to non-profit charities. But the FCRA laws do not apply to Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) because this comes as business investment and not as philanthropy. The use of business entities to indulge in social-political interventions is a ploy to maintain secrecy on the goals and activities.
(𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐒𝐧𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚 𝐛𝐲 𝐑𝐚𝐣𝐢𝐯 𝐌𝐚𝐥𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐫𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐕𝐢𝐣𝐚𝐲𝐚 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧)
(to be continued)
